{"@context":["https://w3id.org/fdo/context/v1",{"schema":"https://schema.org/","prov":"http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#","fdo":"https://w3id.org/fdo/vocabulary/"}],"@id":"https://fdo.portal.mardi4nfdi.de/fdo/Q693164","@type":"DigitalObject","kernel":{"@id":"https://fdo.portal.mardi4nfdi.de/fdo/Q693164","digitalObjectType":"https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle","primaryIdentifier":"mardi:Q693164","kernelVersion":"v1","immutable":true,"modified":"2026-03-26T18:58:48Z"},"profile":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q693164","name":"Rebuttal of Kowalenko's paper as concerns the irrationality of Euler's constant \\(\\gamma\\)","headline":"Rebuttal of Kowalenko's paper as concerns the irrationality of Euler's constant \\(\\gamma\\)","description":"scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6113952","url":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q693164","datePublished":"2012-12-07","author":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q240324"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q442465"}],"publisher":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q190587"}],"identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"doi","value":"10.1007/S10440-012-9697-Z","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/S10440-012-9697-Z"},"sameAs":["https://doi.org/10.1007/S10440-012-9697-Z"],"comment":"The irrationality of Euler's constant \\(\\gamma\\) is widely believed to be true, but it still remains a major open problem in number theory to give a proof. In this short note, the authors rebut two claims of \\textit{V. Kowalenko} [Acta Appl. Math. 109, No. 2, 413--437 (2010; Zbl 1208.11032)], namely, that he proved the irrationality of \\(\\gamma\\), and that his rational series for \\(\\gamma\\) is new.","citation":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q966483"}]},"provenance":{"prov:generatedAtTime":"2026-03-26T18:58:48Z","prov:wasAttributedTo":"MaRDI Knowledge Graph"}}