{"@context":["https://w3id.org/fdo/context/v1",{"schema":"https://schema.org/","prov":"http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#","fdo":"https://w3id.org/fdo/vocabulary/"}],"@id":"https://fdo.portal.mardi4nfdi.de/fdo/Q1293972","@type":"DigitalObject","kernel":{"@id":"https://fdo.portal.mardi4nfdi.de/fdo/Q1293972","digitalObjectType":"https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle","primaryIdentifier":"mardi:Q1293972","kernelVersion":"v1","immutable":true,"modified":"2025-07-16T20:07:30Z"},"profile":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1293972","name":"Carathéodory balls and norm balls in a class of convex bounded Reinhardt domains","headline":"Carathéodory balls and norm balls in a class of convex bounded Reinhardt domains","description":"scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1310630","url":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1293972","datePublished":"2000-07-02","author":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1293971"}],"publisher":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q173732"}],"identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"doi","value":"10.1007/BF02808173","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02808173"},"sameAs":["https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02808173"],"comment":"Let \\(D \\subset {\\mathbb C}^n\\) be a bounded convex domain that is balanced (i.e. \\(\\lambda D \\subset D\\) for \\(\\lambda \\in {\\mathbb C}, |\\lambda|\\leq 1\\)). Then \\(D\\) defines a norm \\(\\mu_D\\) on \\({\\mathbb C}^n\\) such that \\({\\mathbb B}_{\\mu_D}(0,1) = D\\).    Let \\(c_D\\) denote the Carathéodory distance on \\(D\\). For \\(s > 0\\) it is known that \\({\\mathbb B}_{c_D}(0,s) = {\\mathbb B}_{\\mu_D}(0,s^*)\\) for a certain \\(s^* >0\\). The question which other Carathéodory ball coincides with a \\(\\mu_D\\)-ball was first studied by \\textit{B. Schwarz} in the case of \\(D = \\{ z\\in {\\mathbb C}^2: |z_1|+ |z_2|< 1\\}\\) [Isr. J. Math. 84, No. 1-2, 119-128 (1993; Zbl 0786.32020)]. More general cases, the so-called complex ellipsoids, were investigated by \\textit{B. Schwarz} and \\textit{U. Srebro} [Banach Cent. Publ. 37, 75-83 (1996; Zbl 0873.32027)], \\textit{U. Srebro} [Isr. J. Math. 89, No. 1-3, 61-70 (1995; Zbl 0829.32010)], and \\textit{W. Zwonek} [ Isr. J. Math. 89, No. 1-3, 71-76 (1995; Zbl 0824.32007); Ann. Pol. 64, No. 2, 183-194 (1996; Zbl 0864.32017)]. It turned out that most of the Carathéodory balls for most of the complex ellipsoids are different from \\(\\mu_D\\)-balls.    The paper under review deals with convex bounded domains of the following type  \\[  D = \\{ z\\in {\\mathbb C}^n: |z_1|^{2p_1}+ 2a|z_1|^{p_1}|z_2|^{p_2} + |z_2|^{2p_2} + \\sum^n_{j=3} |z_j|^{2p_j} < 1\\}, \\quad a> 0, p_j > 0.  \\]  The main result is the following: a Carathéodory ball \\({\\mathbb B}_{c_D}(z,r)\\) \\((z\\in D \\setminus \\{0\\}, r>0)\\) is a \\(\\mu_D\\)-ball iff \\(a=0\\), exactly one of the \\(p_{\\ell}\\)'s, say \\(p_k\\), is equal 1 and \\(p_j = 1/2\\) for \\(j\\not= k\\), \\(z_k\\not= 0\\) and \\(z_j=0\\) for \\(j\\not= k\\). In particular, this result is the complete answer to the question from above in the case of complex ellipsoids.","citation":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q3892778"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q5906444"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q3954081"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1838625"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q5667036"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4405392"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q3958740"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q5758453"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1310156"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1804787"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q3949259"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q3995636"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1804789"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4717634"}]},"provenance":{"prov:generatedAtTime":"2025-07-16T20:07:30Z","prov:wasAttributedTo":"MaRDI Knowledge Graph"}}