{"@context":["https://w3id.org/fdo/context/v1",{"schema":"https://schema.org/","prov":"http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#","fdo":"https://w3id.org/fdo/vocabulary/"}],"@id":"https://fdo.portal.mardi4nfdi.de/fdo/Q1293687","@type":"DigitalObject","kernel":{"@id":"https://fdo.portal.mardi4nfdi.de/fdo/Q1293687","digitalObjectType":"https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle","primaryIdentifier":"mardi:Q1293687","kernelVersion":"v1","immutable":true,"modified":"2025-07-16T19:56:54Z"},"profile":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1293687","name":"On the proximity of divisors of integers","headline":"On the proximity of divisors of integers","description":"scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1310085","url":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1293687","datePublished":"1999-11-30","author":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1265263"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q423608"}],"publisher":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q167107"}],"identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"doi","value":"10.1006/JNTH.1998.2355","url":"https://doi.org/10.1006/JNTH.1998.2355"},"sameAs":["https://doi.org/10.1006/JNTH.1998.2355"],"comment":"The authors consider the interesting problem of finding conditions on \\(\\lambda\\geq 0\\) such that, for almost all \\(r\\)-tuples \\((n_1,\\dots, n_r)\\) of positive integers, there exist divisors \\(d_j|n_j\\) \\((1\\leq r)\\) with  \\[ 0<\\log (d_j/d_1)\\leq (\\log n_1)^{-\\lambda}, \\qquad 2\\leq j\\leq r. \\]  \\textit{A. Raouj} considered the case \\(r=2\\) in [Acta Arith. 69, 121-152, 171-188 (1995; Zbl 0821.11045)] where it is shown that the statement above holds for \\(\\lambda< \\lambda_2^*= \\log 4-1\\) and fails for \\(\\lambda> \\lambda_2^*\\).   In this paper the authors tackle the cases \\(r=3\\), \\(r\\geq 4\\). They prove that when \\(r=3\\) the critical value of \\(\\lambda\\) is \\(\\lambda_3^*= -1+(3/2)\\log 2\\), in the sense that the statement above holds for \\(\\lambda< \\lambda_3^*\\) and fails for \\(\\lambda> \\lambda_3^*\\). However when \\(r\\geq 4\\) they show that the statement fails for all \\(\\lambda\\geq 0\\). In all cases an estimate of the number of \\(r\\)-tuples \\((n_1,\\dots, n_r)\\) with \\(n_j\\leq x_j\\) that lie in the exceptional set is obtained. Inevitably the proof is very technical and depends on a number of subsidiary results.","citation":[{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1840080"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4716269"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q5515488"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q1252889"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4040373"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q791574"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4763938"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4200287"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q3123961"},{"@id":"https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/entity/Q4332879"}]},"provenance":{"prov:generatedAtTime":"2025-07-16T19:56:54Z","prov:wasAttributedTo":"MaRDI Knowledge Graph"}}